NW Recovery Centers Logo
News

Feds Charge Father and Son in $1.6 Billion Rehab Fraud, the Largest Case of Its Kind

Prosecutors charged 15 people, including a father and son accused of billing $1.6 billion for sham rehab. What families should check before choosing a program.

8 min readBy NW Recovery Centers Editorial Team
Soft editorial illustration of a row of identical houses with one door standing open

Federal prosecutors in Los Angeles on Thursday charged 15 people, six of them medical professionals, in health care fraud schemes that they say produced about $2 billion in fraudulent claims. The largest piece of the takedown is what the Justice Department calls the biggest substance abuse treatment fraud case it has ever brought: more than $1.6 billion billed to private insurers for treatment that was often unnecessary, sometimes nonexistent, and in some cases designed to keep people sick enough to keep billing.

Nathan Young, 39, and his father David Young, 71, both of Los Angeles, are accused of controlling dozens of purported treatment companies in the Los Angeles area and around the country, and of paying "body brokers" to bring them patients from other states. Eight of the 15 defendants were arrested Thursday, and seven more were charged but not arrested. They are presumed innocent; an indictment is an allegation, not a finding of guilt.

For families, the case matters for a reason that has nothing to do with the defendants: nearly every tactic described in the charging documents is something a relative could have noticed first.

What the indictment says happened

Prosecutors describe a recruitment pipeline rather than a treatment program. Brokers, including Honey Phipps, 42, and Cody Phipps, 36, of Greenville, Texas, are accused of targeting "vulnerable populations, such as individuals who were homeless and in poverty and individuals attending substance abuse support groups" — people at their most reachable, including people sitting in recovery meetings.

The screening criterion was not clinical need. According to the indictment, the conspirators sought out people whose insurance paid the most, and in some cases "fraudulently enrolled individuals in new insurance policies for which they were not eligible" to raise the payout. The Orange County Register, which has covered the Youngs since 2024, reported that brokers referred to clients by their insurer rather than their name, and that the complaint quotes one exchange in which Nathan Young weighed a new admission by how much her plan would reimburse.

Patients were induced to travel with offers of free flights, cash, apartments, cars, gift cards, marijuana, cigarettes, controlled substances including illegal drugs, and prescription drugs dispensed by doctors the Youngs employed. Once in California, the documents allege, the offer usually collapsed. People whose insurance paid well were housed in hotels and private apartments. The rest, in the government's words, lived in "cramped, unsanitary, crowded, and often derelict housing described as 'trap houses.'"

The allegations that matter most are about what happened when someone tried to leave. Prosecutors say patients were cycled back through facilities to keep insurance billing, regardless of whether treatment was needed; that patients were "drugged with medication — 'to knock the client out' — if they tried to leave"; that they were cut off from family, denied access to their belongings, and physically blocked from the exits. Employees are accused of coaching patients to fabricate withdrawal symptoms so they would qualify for detox, and of encouraging them to use drugs or alcohol to become eligible for "treatment."

The therapy itself, per the indictment, was a Zoom session with more than 100 attendees in which patients satisfied the requirement by turning on a camera, and were told they could "lay out on [the] beach" instead of participating.

The law this case turns on

Two of the charges rest on a statute most families have never heard of. The Eliminating Kickbacks in Recovery Act, codified at 18 U.S.C. § 220, makes it a crime to knowingly and willfully solicit or receive — or to pay or offer — "any remuneration (including any kickback, bribe, or rebate) directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind" in return for referring a patient to a recovery home, clinical treatment facility, or laboratory, or in exchange for a person using those services.

The penalties are per occurrence: a fine of up to $200,000, up to 10 years in prison, or both. And "clinical treatment facility" is defined broadly enough to cover the whole industry — any setting other than a hospital providing "detoxification, risk reduction, outpatient treatment and care, residential treatment, or rehabilitation for substance use," licensed or certified under state law. A free flight, a paid apartment, or a $500 gift card to a broker can each be the crime, one patient at a time.

The Young case also includes conspiracy to commit health care fraud and wire fraud, plus substantive fraud counts, with additional counts against the father and son. A separate defendant, Nicholas Moore, 33, of North Myrtle Beach, North Carolina, has already pleaded guilty; prosecutors say he admitted helping submit $199 million in fraudulent claims while managing several of the facilities.

Why a billing case is a safety case

It is tempting to file this under insurance fraud — paperwork, not people. The charging documents do not support that reading. A person held in a facility, given drugs to keep them compliant, separated from family, and told that turning on a webcam constitutes therapy is not receiving substandard care. They are being detained.

That matters for how families respond. The usual advice — check the reviews, ask about credentials — assumes a program wants to be judged on its care. A scheme built on reimbursement is optimized for a different metric: how long a policy keeps paying.

The takedown was broader than rehab: the same announcement included $134 million in allegedly unnecessary artery procedures and more than $138 million in hospice fraud. Assistant Attorney General Colin M. McDonald said the message was simple: "if you steal health care dollars from the American taxpayer or abuse your position to harm patients, we are coming for you — and the data will lead us to you."

How to check a program before you send someone

California gives families more leverage than most people use. The Department of Health Care Services has sole authority to license residential nonmedical facilities that treat alcohol and other drug problems, and to certify outpatient programs. A license is required as soon as a residence provides detox, individual or group sessions, educational sessions, or treatment planning.

Two details are worth knowing. First, since Health and Safety Code § 11834.015, every licensed adult facility must also hold a DHCS Level of Care Designation or a residential ASAM Level of Care certification — so "we are licensed" describes a floor, not the care you are buying. Second, DHCS certification is a separate, higher bar that "identifies those facilities that exceed minimum levels of service quality." Ask which one a program holds, and for the license number. The Licensing and Certification Division can be reached at (916) 322-2911.

Then judge the offer, not the brochure:

  • Anyone who offers to fly your family member across the country for free, or pays them to enroll, is describing a crime. Under § 220, that is the conduct, not a perk.
  • If the program asks for the insurance card before the medical history, that is the wrong order. Legitimate intake starts with assessment.
  • Ask for the first week's schedule — real groups, real clinical hours. Camera-optional video calls are not treatment.
  • Insist on direct contact with your relative. Refused visitation is a serious warning sign; if someone is being physically prevented from leaving, call 911.
  • Read the explanation of benefits. Charges for dates your relative was not there, or services they never received, belong with the insurer and the HHS Office of Inspector General.

Families choosing a program can work through our guide to questions to ask before choosing a rehab center, and anyone being pushed toward an out-of-state placement should read how insurance coverage for addiction treatment actually works before agreeing to travel. If a move into sober living is part of the plan, what sober living homes are and are not is the place to start.

What happens next

Five were expected in federal court in downtown Los Angeles on Thursday afternoon, two in the Northern District of Texas, one in the Northern District of Illinois. The Orange County Register reported that Nathan and David Young are on home detention with remote monitoring after posting $4 million bail each, with passports surrendered and a hearing set for Nov. 5. The government says the Youngs' companies were paid more than $210 million of that $1.6 billion.

Civil exposure runs in parallel: the Register reports a $40 million Aetna lawsuit accusing the Youngs of weaponizing addiction for profit, and three deaths in 2024 tied to facilities in the network. None of that is a reason to avoid treatment. It is a reason to ask better questions at the front door.

Where to get help now

  • SAMHSA National Helpline — 1-800-662-4357, free, confidential, 24/7.
  • FindTreatment.gov — search federally listed providers by ZIP code and payment type.
  • 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline — call or text 988.
  • HHS Office of Inspector General — report suspected treatment billing fraud at oig.hhs.gov/fraud/report-fraud.

Sources